#Mit­glie­de­rI­ni


The con­di­ti­ons for rese­arch and tea­ching at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pots­dam are worse than they have been in a long time. The bur­den of high tea­ching loads (up to 24 tea­ching hours per week!) is enorm­ous. This means that many lec­tu­r­ers are forced to teach at an assembly-line pace. This pres­su­re has con­se­quen­ces. Phy­si­cal and men­tal health suf­fer, and per­so­nal aca­de­mic qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on goals are put at risk.

Stu­dents are hea­vi­ly affec­ted by this. Acces­si­bi­li­ty of super­vi­si­on, time for feed­back, research-based and inno­va­ti­ve cour­ses, and the abili­ty to pro­vi­de indi­vi­du­al sup­port and gui­dance to stu­dents must be non-negotiable. Howe­ver, despi­te gre­at efforts and per­so­nal com­mit­ment, lec­tu­r­ers at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pots­dam are incre­asing­ly unable to meet the­se respon­si­bi­li­ties.

We can chan­ge this tog­e­ther! By cal­ling on the Sena­te of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pots­dam through a mem­bers’ initia­ti­ve to final­ly redu­ce tea­ching loads and crea­te bet­ter working and stu­dy con­di­ti­ons.

We are orga­ni­zing in the sum­mer semes­ter of 2025. We are tal­king with col­le­agues and stu­dents and are brin­ging a peti­ti­on with us. We need around 3,500 signa­tures. We can only achie­ve this tog­e­ther!

We are stu­dents and staff mem­bers of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pots­dam. We have foun­ded a mem­bers’ initia­ti­ve and warm­ly invi­te every mem­ber of the uni­ver­si­ty to join us.

On Febru­ary 13, 2025, an initi­al orga­niza­tio­nal mee­ting took place at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pots­dam. More than 30 peo­p­le – employees, stu­dents, and stu­dent workers – par­ti­ci­pa­ted. During the dis­cus­sion, it beca­me clear that we want to tack­le the over­load cau­sed by exces­si­ve tea­ching obli­ga­ti­ons in order to crea­te bet­ter working and stu­dy con­di­ti­ons tog­e­ther.

Sin­ce then, we have draf­ted a pro­po­sal to the Sena­te of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pots­dam. To sub­mit it for dis­cus­sion and review, we need around 3,500 signa­tures from uni­ver­si­ty mem­bers — that is, from stu­dents and staff.

Oppor­tu­ni­ties for par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on through mem­ber initia­ti­ves
All mem­bers of the uni­ver­si­ty – inclu­ding pro­fes­sors, aca­de­mic and non-academic staff, and stu­dents – have been gran­ted the oppor­tu­ni­ty, accor­ding to the amend­ments to § 67, sec­tion 4 of the Bran­den­burg Hig­her Edu­ca­ti­on Act (BbgHG), to bring con­cerns to the Sena­te. A mem­ber initia­ti­ve can be used to rai­se a topic for dis­cus­sion. If suc­cessful­ly sub­mit­ted, the Sena­te is obli­ged to address the issue.

Requi­re­ments for a Mem­ber Initia­ti­ve (accor­ding to § 67, sec­tion 4 BbgHG)

The two repre­sen­ta­ti­ves have the right to per­so­nal­ly pre­sent their con­cern to the rele­vant body and explain the argu­ments of the peti­tio­ners. A decis­i­on must be made and publicly announ­ced within one month of the hea­ring. If the pro­po­sal is rejec­ted, a new request on the same topic can only be made after one year.

The opti­on of a mem­ber initia­ti­ve pro­vi­des a valuable oppor­tu­ni­ty to actively par­ti­ci­pa­te in sha­ping the uni­ver­si­ty and bring cen­tral issues into the aca­de­mic poli­ti­cal dis­cour­se.


The uni­ver­si­ty is not a tea­ching fac­to­ry. Qua­li­ty tea­ching requi­res good working con­di­ti­ons. And a good edu­ca­ti­on needs both.

We see the regu­la­ti­on on tea­ching obli­ga­ti­ons, which is deter­mi­ned by the Sena­te of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Pots­dam, as a key levera­ge point. The cur­rent regu­la­ti­on for deter­mi­ning the tea­ching load of aca­de­mic staff was enac­ted by the university’s Sena­te in 2015. This enact­ment intro­du­ced a sys­te­ma­tic increase in tea­ching loads, par­ti­cu­lar­ly affec­ting per­ma­nent­ly employ­ed staff. The­se increa­ses have been met with ongo­ing pro­tests. We say: redu­ce the tea­ching load!

Our Demands

We want to see this regu­la­ti­on impro­ved. In our pro­po­sal, we sug­gest the fol­lo­wing chan­ges to the tea­ching load:waren.

EmployeesLVS
With oppor­tu­ni­ty for qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on, fixed-term0–4
With oppor­tu­ni­ty for qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on, fixed-term with pro­mi­se for con­tin­ued employ­ment4–8
Pri­ma­ri­ly research-focused, per­ma­nent (Rese­ar­cher)6–8
Pri­ma­ri­ly subject-specific tea­ching, per­ma­nent (Lec­tu­rer)10–12
Tea­ching respon­si­bi­li­ties in lan­guages and artis­tic sub­jects, per­ma­nent13–16
Focus on tea­ching prac­ti­cal skills (espe­ci­al­ly in are­as like sports, music)16–24

A more detail­ed expl­ana­tio­nal and addi­tio­nal mea­su­res are out­lined in our pro­po­sal text.

„We can only achie­ve Decent Labour in Aca­da­mia if we orga­ni­ze.“

– Dr. Clau­dia Rödel, Post-Doc in Micro­bio­lo­gy

„Now is our best chan­ce to fight for bet­ter working and stu­dy­ing con­di­ti­ons.“

– Marie Han­sen, M.A. , Doc­to­ral Stu­dent of Lin­gu­i­stics

„Orga­ni­zing and con­nec­ting with others has hel­ped me feel less power­less.“

– Marie Pel­zer, B.Sc., Psy­cho­lo­gy Stu­dent and Stu­dent Assistant

We hold regu­lar mee­tings whe­re staff and stu­dents work tog­e­ther to prepa­re the cam­paign of the mem­bers’ initia­ti­ve. Ever­yo­ne is warm­ly invi­ted to join and get invol­ved.

Next mee­ting: April 25 at 4:30 PM – online or in per­son (hybrid)
What it’s about: Plan­ning actions (office visits, info booths in the cafe­te­ria, cam­pus fes­ti­val, coor­di­na­ti­on with stu­dent repre­sen­ta­ti­ves) and fina­li­zing cam­paign mate­ri­als.

🔢 Mee­ting ID: 656 6259 9328🔑 Pass­code: 78456143